Welcome


Representative Tsongas is NOT one of us!
Most of us that live in the 37 cities and towns that comprise the 3rd Congressional District would love to be in the stratosphere that is the life style of our Representative”.
In the 2010 Election on a Lowell Sun debate, Ms. Tsongas insinuated that she "was a regular person” and attempted to paint her challenger as an elitist. She also indicated her personal involvement in saving money for us taxpayers. She mentioned not taking a raise and voting for a freeze on a congressional pay raise as well as cutting staff expenses by 75 thousand dollars. Her statement seemed not to be in line with the facts.
Between Jan 1st and 30 July 2010, a six month period, Ms. Tsongas had spent $498.897 for her staff, this projects out to $997,794 for the year! In 2009 her staff expenses were $960,829, In 2008 the expense was $898,711. This does not indicate a reduction but rather a slow increase in the cost to operate her office.

She failed to mention that she voted for the congressional pay raise (H413 on June 19, 2009) before she voted against the automatic pay adjustment in 2010.
On a personal front Ms Tsongas’s income is $174.000 for a congressional salary. Based on Financial Disclosure reports a public record, her net worth is listed as between $1,845,054 and $7,999.999 which ranks her 66th RICHEST in the House of Representatives. Her assets includes her three properties, a small Condo at 52 Lawrence Drive Unit 411M, in Lowell, rarely used other than an election cycle, valued at $119.600. Her primary residence, at 26 Auburn St., Charlestown Ma. Purchased in 2003 for $760,000 with an accessed value of $602,300. And finally her property at 455 Shore Rd. Chatham Ma; valued at $2,440,800.This is the individual who supports Occupy Wall Street and is in fact a FAT CAT!
We personally hope Ms. Tsongas makes and spends whatever she desires, that is the America as it was and should be, not the America she and her fellow elitist elected officials want to make it for us and exclude themselves.

Monday, October 15, 2012

The Devens Debate 10 October 2012

 

Niki Tsongas "I absolutely believe people are better off,"


DEVENS -- The difference between U.S. Rep. Niki Tsongas and challenger Jon Golnik was clear by the time they answered the first question during an hourlong debate Wednesday night: , October 10th 2012

Are people better off than they were two years ago?

"I think the answer to that question is no, they are not," Golnik, a Carlisle Republican, said, citing what he called chronically high unemployment rates and spikes in gas and food prices.

"I absolutely believe people are better off," Tsongas, a Lowell Democrat, said, pointing to 31 consecutive months of private-sector job growth that she attributed to the federal stimulus program. "We are on a path, but is there more to do? You bet there's more to do."

Tsongas and Golnik also debated changes they'd make to the federal tax code, ideas for creating jobs, the Affordable Care Act, Social Security, gridlock in Congress, and how to deal with a nuclear-armed Iran. Golnik, who  was the more aggressive of the two, attacked Tsongas' history of voting with her party on nearly every vote, and Tsongas defended her votes in favor of key legislation on health care and the stimulus, and her work with businesses in the district.

Tsongas praised the effects of government action on the economy, health care and alternative energy subsidies, while Golnik called for repealing the Affordable Care Act, scaling back regulation on businesses and offering those entering the workforce to invest in private accounts as an alternative to Social Security.

The debate, held at the Hilton Garden Inn, was sponsored by MediaNews Group, the parent company of The Sun and the Sentinel & Enterprise, and by the Nashoba Valley Chamber of Commerce.

One criticism Golnik returned to a few times was Tsongas' vote in favor of the Affordable Care Act, which includes a medical-device excise tax that Golnik said will cost three businesses alone in the 3rd Congressional District $100 million a year. Tsongas said that she did oppose the medical-device tax when it was brought to vote by itself but wouldn't vote against the entire health-care program because of that one component.

"I wasn't going to throw out the baby with the bath water," she said.

Tsongas called for ending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans and extending it for everyone else, while Golnik said he would make the Bush tax cuts permanent. When asked about subsidies for alternative-energy companies, Tsongas pointed to successes such as a Lawrence company and said only three such companies have failed. Golnik called for an end to the subsidies, saying that if they companies were viable, they'd be able to get funding from private-sector sources and not the government.

The stark difference between the candidates was also clear when they were asked what measures they'd take to add jobs to the economy.

Tsongas talked about successes when companies worked in partnership with the government, including a Lawrence company that planned to move to North Carolina but is now staying after working with the federal, state and local governments. She also defended government regulation on what had been a "Wild West" Wall Street. Golnik said companies have $2 trillion on their balance sheets but are afraid to hire workers because of uncertainty thanks to political interference, and said too many regulations stifle the economy by imposing too many restrictions on small businesses.

Golnik defeated Tom Weaver of Westford in the September primary by more than a 2-to-1 margin. He lost to Tsongas in the 2010 election, 55 percent to 42. Tsongas, unchallenged in the Democratic primary, has been in office since winning a special election in 2007.

The debate was moderated by Daniel Asquino, president of Mount Wachusett Community College, and included questions from three panelists: Chris Camire, the Sentinel & Enterprise's Statehouse reporter; Bill Kole, the Associated Press New England bureau chief; and Marisa Donelan, the city editor of the Sentinel & Enterprise.


 

 

Niki Tsongas Ratings

As a general rule of thumb, ANY entity needing OUR tax dollars to exist, rate Ms. Tsongas very high. Any entity that protects your freedom or wallet or business rates her very low!

 

 

Abortion Issues

2012Planned Parenthood - Positions100
2011NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions100%
2011National Right to Life Committee - Positions0%
2010Massachusetts Citizens for Life - Positions on Pro-Life Policy0%
2010NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions100%
2010Planned Parenthood - Positions100%
2009-2010National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - House of Representatives Score100%
2009-2010National Right to Life Committee - Positions0%
2009NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions100%
2009National Right to Life Committee - Positions0%
2008Planned Parenthood - Positions100%

Business and Consumers

2011National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only)100%
2011National Federation of Independent Business - Positions0%
2011National Retail Federation - Positions14%
2011National Small Business Association - Positions66%
2011National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions25%
2011The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions0%
2011United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions19%
2010The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions50%
2010United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions25%
2009-2010Associated General Contractors of America - Positions37%
2009-2010International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions20%
2009-2010National Association of Manufacturers - Positions33%
2009-2010National Retail Federation - Positions25%
2009-2010National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions55%
2009-2010Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions5%
2009United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions29%
2008Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions20%
2008The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions0%
2008United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions56%
2008United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score58%
2007-2008American Forest and Paper Association - Forest Products Advocacy Score66%
2007-2008Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions0%
2007-2008Associated General Contractors of America - Positions100%
2007-2008International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions20%
2007-2008National Association of Manufacturers - Positions23%
2007-2008National Federation of Independent Business - Positions67
2007-2008National Restaurant Association - Positions on Restaurant Advocacy100
2007-2008National Retail Federation - Positions Retail Industry Advocacy40%
2007-2008National Small Business Association - Positions66%
2007-2008National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions66%
2007-2008Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions100%
2007Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions0%
2007The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions0%
2007United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions60%

Conservative

2011American Conservative Union - Positions0%
2011American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score0%
2011Concerned Women for America - Positions14%
2011Eagle Forum - Positions30%
2011Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only)5%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy67%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score21%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score18%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score79%
2011National Journal - Conservative Composite Score25%
2011National Journal - Liberal Composite Score76%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score78%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score33%
2011The Club for Growth - Positions7
2011The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer)0%
2011The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall)5%
2011The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues5%
2010American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score0%
2010American Conservative Union - Positions0%
2010Eagle Forum - Positions0%
2010National Journal - Liberal Composite Score94%
2010National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score0%
2010National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score12%
2010National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score0%
2010National Journal - Conservative Composite Score6%
2010National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy87%
2010National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score97%
2010National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score90%
2010The Club for Growth - Positions0%
2010The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010)10%
2009-2010Americans for Prosperity - Positions0%
2009-2010Campaign for Working Families - Positions0%
2009-2010Christian Coalition of America - Positions0%
2009-2010Concerned Women for America - Positions0%
2009-2010The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010)10%
2009-2010The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session)13%
2009American Conservative Union - Positions0%
2009American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score0%
2009Campaign for Working Families - Positions0%
2009Eagle Forum - Positions0%
2009Heritage Alliance - Positions5%
2009National Journal - Composite Liberal Score85%
2009National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score0%
2009National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score23%
2009National Journal - Composite Conservative Score15%
2009National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score14%
2009Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties14%
2009Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score7%
2009The Club for Growth - Positions4%
2009The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year)16%
2009The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009)11%
2008American Conservative Union - Positions0%
2008Eagle Forum - Positions30%
2008National Journal - Composite Conservative Score15.2%
2008National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score17%
2008National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score15%
2008National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score0%
2008The Club for Growth - Positions0%
2007-2008Americans for Prosperity - Positions20%
2007-2008Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues0
2007-2008Concerned Women for America - Positions75%
2007-2008The John Birch Society - Positions9%
2007American Conservative Union - Positions0%
2007Americans for Prosperity - Positions0%
2007GOPUSA - Positions0%

Foreign Aid and Policy Issues

2011Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score91%
2011Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions50%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score33%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score78%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy67%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score21%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score79%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score18%
2011Peace Action West - Positions60%
2010American Security Council Foundation - Positions10%
2010Peace Action - Positions75%
2010Peace Action West - Positions75%
2009-2010ACT! for America - Positions40%
2009-2010Council for a Livable World - Positions83%
2009-2010PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only)83%
2009-2010Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions50%
2009American Security Council Foundation - Positions50%
2009Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions58%
2009Latin America Working Group - Positions25%
2009NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy0%
2009Peace Action West - Positions69%
2009Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score25%
2008Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions100%
2008Peace Action West - Positions90%
2007-2008ACT! for America - Positions0%
2007-2008Council for a Livable World - Positions87%
2007-2008Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions0%
2007Council for a Livable World - Positions7%
2007Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions100%
2007Latin America Working Group - Positions0%
2007Peace Action West - Positions100%

Health Issues

2011AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Advocacy Association - Positions67%
2011American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions (House Only)100%
2011American Nurses Association - Positions100%
2011Association of University Centers on Disabilities - Positions75%
2011The Children's Health Fund - Positions (House Only)100%
2010American Public Health Association - Positions100%
2010American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology - U.S. House Score100%
2009-2010American Academy of Emergency Medicine - Positions0%
2009-2010American Hospital Association - Positions75%
2009-2010National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions100%
2009-2010Saint Joseph Health System - Positions100%
2009American Nurses Association - Positions100%
2009American Public Health Association - Positions100%
2009American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology - Positions100%
2009Association of University Centers on Disabilities - Positions88%
2009The Children's Health Fund - Positions66%
2008American Public Health Association - Positions100%
2008The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society - U.S. House Score100%
2007-2008American Hospital Association - Positions29%
2007-2008National Breast Cancer Coalition - Positions25%
2007-2008Saint Joseph Health System - Positions100
2007American Public Health Association - Positions100%
2007American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology - Positions100%
2007Association of University Centers on Disabilities - Positions0%
2007Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance - Positions100
2007League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score100%
2007The Children's Health Fund - Positions100%

Labor

2011-2012United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions100%
2011American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions96%
2011Federally Employed Women - Positions100%
2011International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions71%
2010American Federation of Government Employees - Positions100%
2010American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions100%
2010American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions100%
2010Federally Employed Women - Positions60%
2010International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions100%
2010International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score100%
2009-2010Communications Workers of America - Positions89%
2009-2010International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions100%
2009-2010International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions0%
2009-2010National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score100%
2009-2010Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions100%
2009American Federation of Government Employees - Positions100%
2009American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions100%
2009American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score100%
2009American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions100%
2009Federally Employed Women - Positions100%
2009International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions100%
2009International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions100%
2009Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions100%
2009Women Employed - Positions50%
2008American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score100%
2008American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions100%
2008American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions100%
2008American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score100%
2008International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions100%
2008Latin America Working Group - Positions25%
2008Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions100%
2008The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions0%
2008United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers - Positions60
2008Utility Workers Union of America - Positions100%
2007-2008Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score70
2007-2008International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions100%
2007-2008International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions0%
2007-2008United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions100%
2007American Federation of Government Employees - Positions100%
2007American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions100%
2007International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions66%
2007International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions20
2007Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions21%
2007The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions0%
2007United Auto Workers - Positions100%
1997-2008United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers - Lifetime Score60%

Liberal

2011National Journal - Liberal Composite Score76%
2011National Journal - Conservative Composite Score25%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score78%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score21%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score33%
2011National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score18%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score79%
2011National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy67%
2010Americans for Democratic Action - Positions95%
2010National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score97%
2010National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score90%
2010National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score0%
2010National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score12%
2010National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score0%
2010National Journal - Conservative Composite Score6%
2010National Journal - Liberal Composite Score94%
2010National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy87%
2009Americans for Democratic Action - Positions95%
2009Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots - Progressive Action Score55%
2009Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots - Regressive Action Score 10%
2009National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score89%
2009National Journal - Composite Conservative Score15%
2009National Journal - Composite Liberal Score85%
2009National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score77%
2009National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score82%
2008Americans for Democratic Action - Positions100%
2008National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score78%
2008National Journal - Composite Liberal Score85%
2008National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score82%
2008National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score81%
2007-2008Progressive Democrats of America - Positions20%